Comparative analysis of the composition of leukocytes of peripheral blood and hematopoietic organs of Navaga and Burbot
Abstract
The composition of leukocytes reflects the species and ecological characteristics of fish, and the ratio of individual cell types is the functional state of the organism and the nature of the influence of biotic and abiotic stress factors. Currently, the leukocyte composition is well studied in representatives of various systematic and ecological groups, however, comparative analysis in marine and freshwater fish of one family is not enough, whereas it is important for assessing the quality of the habitat and the state of fish health. To obtain such data, a study was made of the composition of leucocytes of navaga and burbot-valuable codshaped representatives of the order Gadiformes. Navaga was caught at the Belomorsk Biological Station of the Moscow State University. ON. Pertsov on the northwestern coast of the Kandalaksha Gulf of the White Sea in August 2014, and burbot on the Volga ridge of the Rybinsk Reservoir in December-January 2014–2015. A comparative study of leukograms Navaga and burbot showed a difference in the percentage ratio of some cellular elements, but significant differences were recorded in the content of neutrophils and blast cell forms in peripheral blood. The revealed insignificant differences between the indices of the fish species under study are probably related to the season of the year and specific features.
About the Authors
T. A. Suvorova
I.D. Papanin’ Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS (FSBIS «IBIW RAS»)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Borok
R. A. Shayakhmetov
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (FSBEI HE «MSU»)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
D. V. Mikryakov
I.D. Papanin’ Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS (FSBIS «IBIW RAS»)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Borok
References
1. Atlas presnovodnyh ryb Rossii [Atlas of Freshwater Fishes of Russia]. 2002. / Pod red. Y.S.Reshetnikova. M.: Nauka. T. 2. 253 s.
2. Galaktionov V. G. 2005. Ehvolyucionnaya immunologiya: uchebnoe posobie [Evolutionary Immunology: The Manual]. M.: IKC Akademkniga. 408 s.
3. Golovina N. A., Trombickij I. D. 1989. Gematologiya prudovyh ryb [Hematology of Pond Fish]. Kishinev: Shtiinca. 156 s.
4. Grushko M. P., Lozhnichenko O. V., Fedorova N. N. 2009. Gemopoehz u osetrovyh ryb [Hemopoiesis in Sturgeons]. Astrahan’: Triada. 190 s.
5. Zabotkina E. A., Mikryakov V. R. 1996. Vliyanie karbofosa na immunokompetentnye kletki i strukturu selezenki karpa [The effect of malathion on immunocompetent cells and spleen structure of carp] // Citologiya. № 4–5. C. 551–554.
6. Zabotkina E. A., Lapirova T. B., Serednyakov V. E., Nesterova T. A. 2015. Ehkologicheskaya plastichnost’ gematologicheskih pokazatelej presnovodnyh kostistyh ryb [Ecological plasticity of hematological parameters of fresh-water teleost fish] // Fiziologiya i biohimiya vodnyh zhivotnyh / otv. red. G. M. Chujko. Yaroslavl’: Kancler. (RAN, Institut biologii vnutrennih vod im. I.D.Papanina. Trudy: vyp. 72(75), 2015). S. 16–29.
7. Ivanov A. A., Pronina G. I., Koryagina N. Yu. 2018. Gematologiya pojkilotermnyh gidrobiontov [Hematology of poikilothermic hydrobionts]. Irkutsk: OOO «Megaprint». 133 s.
8. Ivanova N. T. 1983. Atlas kletok krovi ryb [The Atlas of Blood Cells of Fish]. M.: Leg. i pishch. prom-st’. 184 s.
9. Lebedev K. A., Ponyakina I. D. 1990. Immunogramma v klinicheskoj praktike [Immunogram in clinical practice]. M.: Nauka. 224 s.
10. Maklakova M. E. 2012. Immuno-fiziologicheskij status u ryb iz prirodnyh populyacij i akvakul’tury v norme i pri patologii [Immune-physiological status of fish from natural populations and aquaculture in norm and pathology]: Avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk. Moskva. 25 s.
11. Mikryakov V. R. 1991. Zakonomernosti formirovaniya priobretennogo immuniteta u ryb [Patterns of Formation of Acquired Immunity in Fish]. Rybinsk: IBVV RAN. 153 s.
12. Mineev A. K., Kalinin E. A. 2012. Osobennosti lejkocitarnoj formuly u plotvy (Rutilus rutilus Linnaeus, 1758) iz vodoyomov raznogo tipa (na primere Saratovskogo vodohranilishcha i malyh rek Respubliki Udmurtiya) [Specific features the leukocyte formula in roach (Rutilus rutilus Linnaeus, 1758) from water bodies of different types (by the example of the Saratov reservoir and small rivers of the Republic of Udmurtia)] // Izvestiya Samarskogo NC RAN. № 1. S. 213–217.
13. Nazarova E. A., Zabotkina E. A. 2010. Osobennosti lejkocitarnogo sostava pochek u nekotoryh vidov presnovodnyh i morskih kostistyh ryb [Specific features the composition of leucocytes in the kidneys of some specific of freshwater and marine bony fishes] // Biologiya vnutrennih vod. № 2. S. 92–97.
14. Petrov R. V. 1987. Immunologiya [Immunology]. M.: Medicina. 416 s.
15. Pronina G. I., Petrushin V. A., Terent’ev P.V., Petrushin A. B. 2017. Sravnitel’naya fiziologoimmunologicheskaya ocenka soma obyknovennogo (Silurus glanis) i nalima (Lota lota) [Comparative physiological and immunological assessment of catfish (Silurus glanis) and burbot (Lota lota)] // Veterinariya, zootekhniya i biotekhnologiya. № 6. S. 107–111.
16. Ryby v zapovednikah Rossii [Fishes in nature reserves of Russia]. 2013. V 2 t. (pod red. Y.S.Reshetnikova). T. 2. Morskie ryby. M.: T-vo nauchnyh izdanij KMK. 673 s.
17. Serpunin G. G. 2002. Gematologicheskie pokazateli adaptacij ryb: Avtoref. dis. … dokt. biol. nauk. Kaliningrad [Hematological parameters of fish adaptation, Extended Abstract of Doctor Sci. (Biol) Dissertation]: KGTU. 49 s.
18. Tochilina L. V. 1994. Lejkocitarnaya formula morskih ryb [Leukocyte formula of marine fish] // Gidrobiologicheskij zhurnal. T. 30. № 3. S. 50–57.
19. Haitov R. M., Ignat’eva G.A., Sidorovich I. G. 2002. Immunologiya [Immunology]: Uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Medicina. 536 s.
20. Yahnenko V. M., Klimenkov I. V. 2009. Osobennosti sostava i struktury kletok krovi ryb pelagiali i pribrezh’ya ozera Bajkal [Specific features the composition and structure of blood cells of pelagic fish and the coastal waters of Lake Baikal] // Izvestiya RAN. Seriya biologicheskaya. № 1. s. 46–54.
21. Ainswort A. J. 1992. Fish granulocytes: morphology, distribution and function // Annual Rev. of Fish Diseases. 2, 123–148.
22. Barber D. L., Westermann J. E. 1978. Observations on development and morphological effects of histamine liberator 48/80 on PAS-positive granular leukocytes and heterophils of Catostomus commersoni // J.Fish Biol. 13(5):563–574.
23. Ellis A. E. 1977. The leucocytes of fish: a review // J.Fish. Biol. V. 11. № 5. P. 453–491.
24. Gordeev I. I., Mikryakov D. V., Balabanova L. V., Mikryakov V. R. 2017. Composition of leucocytes in peripheral blood of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides, Smitt, 1898) (Nototheniidae) // Polar Res. V. 36:1, 1374126, DOI:10.1080/17518369.2017.1374126
25. Manning M. J., Nakanishi T. 1996. The specific immune system: cellular defenses. London. Academic Press. P. 160–206.
26. Secombes C. J., Van Groningen J. M., Egberts E. 1983. Ontogeny of the immune system in carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). The appearance of antigenic determinants on lymphoid cells detected by mouse anti-carp thymocyte monoclonal antibodies // Dev. comp. immunol. Vol. 7. P. 455–464.
27. Van Muiswinkel W., Vervoorn-Van Der Wal B. 2006. The immune system of fish // Fish Diseases and Disorders. Vol. 1. P. 678–701.
28. Zapata A. G. 1979. Ultrastructural study of the teleost fish kidney // Develop. and Comp. Immunol. № 3. P. 55–65.
Review
For citations:
Suvorova T.A., Shayakhmetov R.A., Mikryakov D.V. Comparative analysis of the composition of leukocytes of peripheral blood and hematopoietic organs of Navaga and Burbot. Trudy VNIRO. 2018;171:116-122. (In Russ.)
Email this article 