Assessment of various aspects of work of cage fish farms from the perspective of best aquaculture practices

Objective: to verify the principles of best aquaculture practices in cage fish farming to identify constraints to sustainable development and develop ways to reduce their effects

Methods: comparative-a nalytical methods are used. The information basis for analysis was compiled from the responses of farmers to a questionnaire developed in accordance with principles of the best practices.

Novelty: the assessment showed a high degree of compliance of various aspects of cage farming activities with the principles of the best aquaculture practices/

Results: The highest degree of compliance is established for areas that are strictly regulated, and this is facilitated by the control of executive and regulatory authorities. A slightly lower degree of compliance was identified in the groups of criteria related to the fish health and the farm management, which have less strict regulation, but reflect the responsibility of farmers for the safety and productivity of fish, the efficient work of personnel and the economic results of their activities. Areas of activity in the field of reducing environmental impact and interaction with the scientific and educational community were least consistent with the principles of the best aquaculture practices. This may be due to insufficiently developed regulatory framework and due to underestimation by farmers of the importance of these fields for the future. Despite the wide coverage of farms in the survey, relatively few farms responded to the questionnaires, and they also showed a high degree of compliance with the principles of best practices. Most farmers who did not respond to the questionnaire probably have certain difficulties in various fields of their work, which do not allow them to work effectively, to develop sustainably and openly answer the survey questions.

Practical significance: This study is a step in the development of a set of guidelines for the best practices of aquaculture in Russia. The widespread use of this set of rules by farmers can be considered as a methodological basis for the sustainable development of aquaculture in our country.

1. Antipova L. V., Dvoryaninova O. P., Vasilenko O. A., Danyliv M. M., Suleymanov S. M., Shabunin S. V. 2011. Fish Farming. Fundamentals of breeding, fishing, and processing fish in artificial ponds. St. Petersburg: GIORD. 472 p. (In Russ.)

2. Barulin N. V., Liman M. S., Novikova E. G., Shumsky K. L., Atroshchenko L. O., Rogovtsov S. V., Surovets N. A., Nekrylov A. V., Plavsky V.Yu. 2016. Recommendations for Growing Rainbow Trout Fish Seedlings in Industrial Fish Farming Complexes (with Temporary Regulations). Gorki: BSSA. 180 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bedritskaya I. N., Pyatikopova O. V., Sapkova L.Kh., Cheburova A. V. 2025. Methodological Approach to Assessing the Impact of a Cage-Type Fish Farming Facility on Hydrochemical Parameters // Fishery. No. 5. Pp. 88-97. DOI: 10.36038/0131-6184-2025-5-88-97 (In Russ.)

4. Burlachenko I. V., Yakhontova I. V., Barinova V. V. 2024. On the Application of Best Practices Principles in Russian Aquaculture // Trudy VNIRO. 2024. V. 198. P. 64-74. DOI: 10.36038/2307-3497-2024-198-64-74. (In Russ.).

5. Golovina N. A., Strelkov Yu.A., Voronin P. P., Golovin P. P., Evdokimova E. B., Yukhimenko L. N. 2003. Ichthyopathology. / Golovina N. A., Bauer O. N. ed. Moscow: Mir. 448 e. (In Russ.).

6. Zhigin A. V. 2011. Closed Systems in Aquaculture. Moscow: RSAU – K. A. Timiryazev MAA Publishing House. 665 p. (In Russ.)/

7. Mel`chenkov E.A., Myshkin A. V., Kanidieva T. A., Safronov A. S., Slepnev V. A., Kalmykova V. V., Demkina N. V., Zdrok A. V., Romanova N. N. 2019. Methodological recommendations for the formation of productive female stocks of siberian sturgeon at industrial-type enterprises. // Rybnoe. 87p. ISBN 978-5-6042808-4-3 (In Russ.).

8. Pyatikopova O. V., Bedritskaya I. N., Popov D. A., Sapakhova L.Kh. 2025. Hydrological parameters of the environment in the organization of cage fish farms in the Astrakhan region // Aquatic Bioresources and Habitats. Vol. 8, No. 2: 83-94. DOI. 10.47921/2619-1024_2025_8_2_83 (In Russ.)

9. Pyatikopova O. V., Bedritskaya I. N., Dyakova S. A., Popov D. A., Tarasova O. G., Makarova E. V., Minakova E. V., Zhatkina O. V., Kashin R. D. 2024. Features of the conditions of cage fish farming in the Astrakhan Region on the example of the Khurdun River // Izvestiya TINRO. V. 204. No. 3. P. 670-682. DOI: 10.26428/1606-9919-2024-204-670-682. (In Russ.)

10. Rahkonen R., Wennerström P., Rintamäki P., Kannel R. 2013. Healthy Fish. Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Diseases. Research Institute of Hunting and Fisheries. Nykypaino, Helsinki. 177 p. (In Russ.).

11. Aquaculture en cage. Études régionales et aperçu mondial. 2009. / Halwart M., Soto D., Arthur J. R. eds. FAO Document technique sur les pêches. No. 498. Rome, FAO. 259 p.

12. Environmental Best Management Practices for Aquaculture. 2008. / C. S. Tucker, J. A. Hargreaves ed. John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 608 p.

13. Mente, E., Pierce, G.J., Santos, M.B., Neofitou, C. 2006. Effect of feed and feeding in culture of salmonids on the marine aquatic environment: a synthesis for European aquaculture // Aquaculture International, 14: рр. 499-522;

14. Renato A. Quiñones, Marcelo Fuentes, Rodrigo M. Montes, Doris Soto, Jorge León-Muñoz. 2019. Environmental issues in Chilean salmon farming // Reviews in Aquaculture. 11. P. 375-402.

15. Washington S., Ababouch L. 2011. Private standards and certification in fisheries and aquaculture: current practice and emerging issues. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 553. Rome, FAO. 181p.