Industry tools for arctic security of Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.36038/2307-3497-2025-201-140-153
EDN: JIQGWV
Abstract
The purpose of the work: to calculate and determine the level of Arctic security of the regions of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (Arkhangelsk and Murmansk regions, the Republic of Karelia) using the sectoral aggregate criterion of economic security. Based on the results obtained, develop and propose industry-specific tools for ensuring Arctic security.
Materials and methods: the method of econometric analysis and forecasting was applied using a statistical assessment of socio-economic indicators of the Arkhangelsk and Murmansk regions, the Republic of Karelia according to economic security criteria.
Results: in the analyzed period, the Murmansk region showed a high level of Arctic security according to industry criteria, while the Arkhangelsk region and the Republic of Karelia received negative values of the indicator, which means instability to industry risks and threats. This is due to a decrease in the production indicators of sectoral economic entities and the lack of innovation.
Novelty: a forecast assessment of the likelihood of an unfavorable scenario for the implementation of threats to the Arctic security of the Russian Federation was obtained. Recommendations have been developed to prevent and minimize the consequences of risks for the three Arctic regions.
Practical significance: the dynamics of changes in strategic indicators of Arctic security is the basis for making management decisions by regional authorities and the business community; can be used for predictive justification of production, financial and innovative transformations of the industry.
About the Authors
E. E. TolikovaRussian Federation
5, p. 1, 2nd Baumanskaya St., Moscow, 105005;
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, Moscow, 105187
P. M. Bagimov
Russian Federation
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, Moscow, 105187
References
1. Akberdina V. V., Grebenkin A . V., Smirnova O. P. 2017. Comprehensive tools for assessing the economic security of sectors of the economy: regional aspect // Regional economy. T. 13. № . 4. p. 1264-1279.
2. Senchagov V. K. 2013. Strategic threats and risks in the economic sphere // Civil protection strategy: problems and research. Vol. 3. № 2. p. 120-141.
3. Senchagov V. K. 2014. Methodology for determining the threshold values of the main (priority) risk factors and threats to the economic security of economic entities // Economics. Taxes. Right. № 4. p. 73-78.
4. Kolonchin K.V., Betin O.I. 2022. XXI century – the century of the Arctic // Proceedings of VNIRO. T. 188. p. 5-12. DOI: 10.36038/2307‑3497‑2022‑188‑5‑12
5. Kolonchin K.V., Seregin S.N., Belyaev V.A., Tazetdinov R.R. 2024. Methodology for assessing the reserves of aquatic biological resources in the Arctic seas // Economics, Labor, Management in agriculture. № 7 (113). p. 3-14.
6. Kolmakov A.N., Tolikova E.E., Sharia M.V. 2025. Evolution and development of scientific and technological infrastructure of the fishery complex / /Economy, Labor, Management in agriculture. № 3 (121). p. 164-175.
7. Mitin S.G., Kolonchin K.V., Seregin S.N., Tazetdinov R.R. 2025. Assessment of reserves of aquatic biological resources in the Arctic seas for their industrial development and processing // Economics, Labor, Management in Agriculture. № 3 (121). p. 176-187
8. Selin V. S., Bashmakova E. P. 2010. The importance of the northern and Arctic territories in the new geoeconomic conditions for the development of Russia // Region: economics and sociology. № 3. p. 23-39.
Review
For citations:
Tolikova E.E., Bagimov P.M. Industry tools for arctic security of Russian Federation. Trudy VNIRO. 2025;201:140-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/2307-3497-2025-201-140-153. EDN: JIQGWV





























