Dynamics of natural polymorphism of Russian sturgeon in the Sea of Azov over a twenty-year period of using broodstock in artificial reproduction
https://doi.org/10.36038/2307-3497-2025-201-109-117
EDN: HXGWEE
Abstract
The aim is to assess the impact of using RBS Russian sturgeon on the level of genetic polymorphism in the released juveniles and on the dynamics of the allele composition of the population in the Sea of Azov.
Methods: Polymorphism analysis was carried out at five microsatellite (STR) loci (Afug41, An20, AoxD161, AoxD165, Afug51) on two samples of Russian sturgeon: I. individuals captured in the Sea of Azov in 1999-2003 (250 samples, offspring of «wild» broodstock) and II. individuals captured in 2020-2024 (250 samples, offspring of broodstock from established RBS).
Novelty: For the first time, comparative genetic analysis results are presented for archival (1999-2003) and contemporary (2020-2024) Russian sturgeon samples, along with an assessment of the temporal stability of the population’s genetic structure.
Results: Comparison of microsatellite data between the two samples (offspring of natural and artificially reproduced broodstock) showed that the mean number of alleles per locus did not change significantly over the 25‑year period. However, in the sample of offspring from artificial reproduction, the mean number of alleles per individual decreased slightly (by 2.41%), and the proportion of homozygotes was higher compared to the wild-origin offspring (0.07 vs. 0.05, respectively). These results indicate that allele diversity in the Azov population of Russian sturgeon remains at a stable level, although a slight increase in the inbreeding coefficient was observed.
Practical significance: The findings demonstrate the high efficiency of artificial reproduction in maintaining the natural genetic diversity of Russian sturgeon and can be applied in genetic monitoring at sturgeon hatcheries to ensure the long-term maintenance of offspring genetic heterogeneity.
About the Authors
A. Sh. AlimovaRussian Federation
21 в, Beregovaya st., Rostov-on-Don, 344002;
194/1, Stachki Av., Rostov-on-Don, 344006
A. V. Usatov
Russian Federation
21 в, Beregovaya st., Rostov-on-Don, 344002
N. A. Nebesikhina
Russian Federation
194/1, Stachki Av., Rostov-on-Don, 344006
N. S. Mugue
Russian Federation
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, Moscow, 105187
References
1. Barmintseva A.E., Mugue N.S. 2013. The use of microsatellite loci for species identification of sturgeons (Acipenseridae) and detection of hybrid individuals // Genetics. V. 49. No. 9. P. 1093. DOI: 10.7868/S0016675813090020. (In Russ.).
2. Bugaev L.A., Nebesikhina N.A., Alimova A.Sh., Gaidamachenko V.N. 2023. Genetic diversity of Russian sturgeon broodstock from the repair-maternal stock of the Don Sturgeon Hatchery, FSBI «Glavrybvod» in 2018-2023 // Rational Use of Aquatic Biological Resources. Proc. Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf., Vladivostok, 26-27 Oct. 2023. Vladivostok: Dalrybvtuz. P. 140-146. (In Russ.).
3. Vasev A.B., Luzhnyak V.A., Barinova V.V. 2023. Results of studies of Azov sturgeon populations during monitoring of the fishery using set fishing gear off the Kuban coast // Aquatic Bioresources and Environment. V. 6. No. 4. P. 68-78. (In Russ.).
4. Korneev A. A., Baskakova T. E. 1984. Results of sturgeon reproduction under regulated flow conditions of the Don River // Reproduction of Fish Stocks in the Caspian and Azov Seas. P. 54-62. (In Russ.).
5. Kostyuchenko V.A. 1955. Biology and state of the sturgeon fishery in the Sea of Azov before river flow regulation // Trudy VNIRO. V. 31. P. 174-187. (In Russ.).
6. Mirzoyan A.V., Belousov V.N., Shevchenko V.N. 2023. Artificial reproduction of semi-anadromous fish species under different hydrological development scenarios in the Sea of Azov // Aquatic Bioresources and Environment. V. 6. No. 4. P. 91-108. DOI: 10.47921/2079‑4418‑2023‑6‑4‑91‑108. (In Russ.).
7. Rekov Yu.I. 2002. Stocks of Azov sturgeon species: current status and near-term prospects // Main Problems of Fisheries and Protection of Fishery Water Bodies of the Azov-Black Sea Basin. Coll. Sci. Pap. (2000-2001). Moscow: Natsrybresursy. P. 265-272. (In Russ.).
8. Rekov Yu.I., Tikhonova G.A., Chepurnaya T.A. 2004. Prospects for restoring stocks of Azov migratory sturgeon through natural and artificial reproduction // Problems of Natural and Artificial Reproduction of Fish in Marine and Freshwater Bodies. Abstr. Int. Sci. Conf. Rostov-on-Don, 2004. Rostov-on-Don: TsVVR. P. 128-129. (In Russ.).
9. Rekov Yu.I., Chepurnaya T.A. 2018. Main directions for restoring commercial stocks of Azov sturgeon species // Current Issues of Fisheries, Fish Farming (Aquaculture) and Environmental Monitoring of Aquatic Ecosystems: Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. dedicated to the 90th anniversary of AzNIIRKH, Rostov-on-Don, 11-12 Dec. 2018. Rostov-onDon: AzNIIRKH. P. 211-214. (In Russ.).
10. Timoshkina N.N., Vodolazhsky D.I., Usatov A.V. 2010. Molecular genetic markers in the study of intra- and interspecific polymorphism of sturgeons (Acipenseriformes) / Ecological Genetics. V. 8. No. 1. P. 12-24. DOI: 10.7868/S2072683X1001003X. (In Russ.).
11. Shcherbakova V. D., Barmintseva A. E., Safronov A. S. 2023. Assessment of genetic diversity in Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt, 1833) stocks of the Caspian population from seven sturgeon hatcheries of FSBI “Glavrybvod” // Modern Problems and Prospects for the Development of the Fisheries Complex. Proc. XI Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. of Young Scientists and Specialists, St. Petersburg, 25-26 Sept. 2023. Moscow: VNIRO. P. 243-245. (In Russ.).
12. Aljanabi S.M., Martinez I. 1997. Universal and rapid saltextraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques // Nucleic Acids Research. V. 25. No. 20. P. 4692-4693. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.22.4692.
13. Birstein V. J., Bemis W. E., Waldman J. 1997. The threatened status of acipenseriform species: a summary // Sturgeon Biodiversity and Conservation / Eds. V. J. Birstein, W. E. Bemis, J. Waldman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. P. 427-435. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007382724251.
14. Boscari E., Gessner J., Piferrer F. 2014. Captive breeding programs based on family groups in polyploid sturgeon species // PLoS ONE. V. 9. No. 11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110951.
15. Clo J, Kolář F. 2022. Inbreeding depression in polyploid species: a meta-analysis // Biol Lett. V. 18. No. 12. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0477.
16. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis // Palaeontologia Electronica. V. 4. No. 1. P. 9. DOI: 10.26879/259.
17. Kincaid H.L. 1983. Inbreeding in fish populations used for aquaculture // Aquaculture. V. 33. No. 1-4. P. 215-227. DOI: 10.1016/0044‑8486(83)90402‑7.
18. Ortega-Villaizán M. del M., Noguchi D., Taniguchi N. 2011. Minimization of genetic diversity loss of endangered fish species captive broodstocks by means of minimal kinship selective crossbreeding // Aquaculture. V. 318. Iss. 1-2. P. 239-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.047.
19. Secor D.H., Arefjev V., Nikolaev A., Sharov A. 2000. Restoration of sturgeons: lessons from the Caspian Sea Sturgeon Ranching Programme // Fish and Fisheries. V. 1. No. 3. P. 215-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467‑2979.2000.00021.x.
Review
For citations:
Alimova A.Sh., Usatov A.V., Nebesikhina N.A., Mugue N.S. Dynamics of natural polymorphism of Russian sturgeon in the Sea of Azov over a twenty-year period of using broodstock in artificial reproduction. Trudy VNIRO. 2025;201:109-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/2307-3497-2025-201-109-117. EDN: HXGWEE





























